Crime+Scene+Script

media type="custom" key="4715077"

My name is Detective Joshua. Two weeks ago I was called to a crime scene at a 2 bedroom 1 bathroom beach house. The alleged victim was Felix Naveda, a rich man who parnets died of a bongi-jump accident. The suspect guilty of committing this crime is Kendra Goode and her motive was to kill Felix because all she wanted is money. This suspect's guilt was confirmed through the testing and results of evidence collected at the crime scene.

The most incriminating piece of evidence was the secret note. The evidence was found by a gutiar pick and blood. The test performed was a PH test. (It was a handwriting test) The results of the test that the note said ''I'm glad it's over and Felix is dead" and signed by Vera, but she didn't write it. This connects the suspect to the crime because is the one that wrote the note and blamed it on vera.. (Who wrote it and why would they put Vera's name on it?)

The next piece of evidence collected was the cola. It was found by the body outline, and the waste basket. The test performed was a DNA test (This was a Ph test). . The results of the test were that Felixs cup was poisned. (What was it poisoned with? How do you know it was poisoned with candy?) This connects the suspect to the crime because the test results connect to this suspect because she loves candy food coloring, and she used it to poisn him.

Another piece of evidence is the fingerprints on the cups. It was found by the bodies outline. The test performed was a Fingerprint test. The results of the test were that it couldn'v been kendra who killed Felix. This connects the suspect to the crime because she used somrthing to poisn the drink.

The last piece of evidence collected was the candy food coloring. It was found by the note and gutair pick. The test performed was Ph (This was the chromotography or colors test). The results of the test were that it was the candy food coloring and not Alfrados brown felt pen. This connects the suspect to the crime because Kendra and Vera are the only two suspects that like candy.

According to the evidence, the following is an account of the events believed to have gone down on that fateful day. One day they were at their own house when they got the inventions. Gene was sleeping on the couch when Alfrado called him. Vera went on a walk at 2:00 in the afternoon, when Alfrado called her. Kendra was taking a shower when Alfrado called her. Alfrado called everyone to the patio were he saw Felix on the ground dead. (This was supposed to be an account of how the suspect pulled off the murder.)

Therefore, Kendra committed the crime of Felix, of poisning himn with the candy food coloring for all of his money that he got from his parents.

**Rubric for Podcasts** introduction. Provides relevant information and establishes a clear purpose engaging the listener immediately. || **__Describes the topic and engages the audience as the introduction proceeds.__** || Somewhat engaging (covers well-known topic), and provides a vague purpose. || Irrelevant or inappropriate topic that minimally engages listener. Does not include an introduction or the purpose is vague and unclear. ||^  || You stumbled over a few words and more practice can help fix this problem || Appears unrehearsed with uneven delivery. || Delivery is hesitant, and choppy and sounds like the presenter is reading. ||^  || I couldn't understand what you were syaing in the beginning, but it got better later || Enunciation, expression, rhythm are sometimes distracting during the podcast. || Enunciation of spoken word is distant and muddled and not clear. Expression and rhythm are distracting throughout the podcast. ||^  || 72% ||
 * ** CATEGORY ** || ** Exemplary **  || ** Proficient **  || ** Partially Proficient **  || ** Incomplete **  || ** POINTS **  ||
 * ** Introduction ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Catchy and clever
 * ^  || **__ Tells who is speaking, date the podcast was produced, and where the speaker is located.  __** || Tells most of the following: who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Alludes to who is speaking, date of the podcast, and location of speaker.  || Speaker is not identified. No production date or location of the speaker is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Content ** || ** 6 points ** || ** 4 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || The motive was detailed and clearly based on information delivered throughout the investigation.  || **__The motive is detailed and based on partial information delivered throughout the investigation.__**  || The motive is not very detailed and is sprinkled with inaccurate information.  || The motive is missing, or unclear or all information is inaccurate.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || Four pieces of strong evidence were presented and linked to the suspect in an organized, methodical manner.  || Three or four pieces of evidence were presented and/or linked to the suspect in a somewhat organized, thoughtful manner.  || __**Two pieces of shaky evidence were presented and/or loosely linked to the suspect. Lack of organization.**__  || One to no pieces of unimportant evidence were presented in an unorganized manner.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || The events in the scenario are detailed, extremely organized and strongly supported with evidence and facts related to the crime scene.  || The events in the scenario are well organized, somewhat detailed, and supported with evidence from the crime scene. || __** The events in the crime scene lack organization, detail, and are weakly supported with evidence from the crime scene. **__ || There was no clear direction and evidence was unimportant. ||^   ||
 * ^  || Conclusion clearly summarizes key information.  || **__Conclusion summarizes information.__**  || Conclusion vaguely summarizes key information  || No conclusion is provided.  ||^   ||
 * ** Delivery ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 point ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || Well rehearsed, smooth delivery in a conversational style.  || **__ Rehearsed, smooth delivery.  __**
 * ^  || Highly effective enunciation and presenter's speech is clear and intelligible, not distant and muddled. Expression, and rhythm keep the audience listening. || **__Enunciation, expression, pacing are effective throughout the podcast.__**
 * ^  || Correct grammar is used throughout the podcast.  || **__ Correct grammar is used during most of the podcast.  __** || Occasionally incorrect grammar is used during the podcast.  || Poor grammar is used throughout the podcast.  ||^   ||
 * ** Graphic and Music Enhancements ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Music enhances the mood, quality, and understanding of the presentation.  __** || Music provides supportive background to the podcast.  || Music provides somewhat distracting background to the podcast.  || Music is distracting to presentation.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ All music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared with appropriate documentation.  __** || Music enhancements are owned by the creator of the podcast or copyright cleared.  || Use of copyrighted works is questionable.  || Copyright infringement is obvious.  ||^   ||
 * ** Technical Production ** || ** 3 points ** || ** 2 points ** || ** 1 points ** || ** 0 points ** || ||
 * ^  || **__ Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment without background noise and distractions.  __** || Presentation is recorded in a quiet environment with minimal background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a semi-quiet environment with some background noise and distractions.  || Presentation is recorded in a noisy environment with constant background noise and distractions.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__ Transitions are smooth and spaced correctly without noisy, dead space.  __** || Transitions are smooth with a minimal amount of ambient noise.  || Transitions are uneven with inconsistent spacing; ambient noise is present.  || Transitions are abrupt and background noise needs to be filtered.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Volume of voice, music, and effects enhance the presentation.__**  || Volume is acceptable.  || Volume is occasionally inconsistent.  || Volume changes are highly distracting.  ||^   ||
 * ^  || **__Podcast length keeps the audience interested and engaged.__**  || Podcast length keeps audience listening.  || Podcast length is somewhat long or somewhat short to keep audience engaged.  || Podcast is either too long or too short to keep the audience engaged.  ||^   ||
 * ** TOTAL POINTS ** || 41/57